INVESTMENTS TO AVOID

Occasionally I’m told “Those south west suburbs of Brisbane are so far away. I’d prefer to buy an investment locally – so that I can inspect it at any time”.

That’s fine by me – if a prospective clients wishes me to help, I bring my years of professional expertise into play, and do my utmost to achieve an outstanding result for them. But if they want to do it on their own, I’m not upset (except when they ring me a few years later and say “we really should have listened to you.”)

Over the years I have learned that a genuine investment decision is based on an analysis of the numbers – nothing else. There is no place for emotion in any form of serious investing.

And the fact is - once you've acquired an investment, very rarely do you ever visit it again.

My focus is on helping my private clients retire with more. And in my years of experience, there is nothing that can compare to the benefits of investment properties for late career couples who have inadequate retirement funding.

The formula is: who is the Ideal Tenant? what do they want to live in? how much can an typical investor afford?

These questions guide us to the Product.

Then we ask: where should the Product be located?

The answer combines 1) a growth corridor 2) where rents are higher 3) where land tax is lower 4) close to a major cluster of jobs.

The Conclusion - an off-the-plan four bedroom home in the south west suburbs of Brisbane is the ideal investment property for you.

Other forms of property investment – and other locations - carry hidden problems that investors should best avoid.

In particular, I would mention that we do not normally share with private clients investments that are

· Existing housing stock
· Inner city apartments (either high rise or low rise)
· Serviced offices or serviced apartments
· Student accommodation
· Cluster housing and/or gated communities
· Defence Force housing
· Locations distant from a capital city
· Factories or commercial office space
· Postcodes that the banks dislike
· Locations dominated by one industry e.g. mining, tourism
· Suburbs not adjacent to a major economic zone

as each of the above “opportunities” carries hidden problems which slow the accumulation investment program, and consequently are not as attractive as a brand new stand-alone family home in an established suburb in a growth corridor adjacent to a major and diversified economic zone (i.e. where the jobs are).

Let me know if you disagree. Simply hit the reply button on this email.

Or email me – Bernard Kelly – admin@retirelaughing.com