OLD v. NEW – the $100,000 DIFFERENCE
A private client recently asked “with home prices falling, shouldn’t I take advantage of lower prices?”
My response was along the lines “certainly – if you can find a suitable investment $100,000 below the price for new”
Let’s say that to attract a suitable tenant into an established house, you’ll need an investment that’s not too old, say ten years old.
It works this way – if you purchase existing housing stock, you’ll pay full stamp duty – that’s $10,000 extra.
Then the difference on the depreciation on a house ten years old compared to one off-the-plan today is probably $40,000.
Then repairs and maintenance during the next ten years could well be $50,000 for an investment already now ten years old, compared to virtually zero for an off-the-plan investment during its first ten years.
That’s the $100,000 difference.
So if I offer you an investment today for say $380,000, to be better off you’ll need to find something that will attract a suitable tenant for less than $280,000. That’s quite an ask.
And you’ll also miss out on the research and packaging – which regional market will be best over the next five years, and my introductions to an investment- aware funding strategist, to an investment-aware property solicitor, to an investment-aware property accountant, to an investment-aware insurance broker and to an investment-aware asset manager.
And now with lower interest rates, an investor on $70,000 will only need to outlay $28,800 over the next six years to be in full control of this $380,000 investment.
If you would like me to explain in more detail, contact me – Bernard Kelly – anytime on admin@retirelaughing.com

No comments:
Post a Comment