AVOID ANY RELIANCE ON GOVERNMENT WELFARE

The consultation paper on retirement incomes – as part of the Henry review into the tax system – notes that there are now five people of working age for each person over 65.

However by 2047, this ratio will fall to only 2.4 persons.

The consequence of having relatively more of us retired and less of us in the workforce will mean that the cost of the age pension will increase from 2.5% of the gross domestic product to 4.4%.

In addition there will be larger demands by the health sector to pay for the ever increasing cost of caring for an increasingly older population and ever increasingly costly medical equipment and drugs.

The economy will simply not be able to sustain the pension as we currently know it.

A likely scenario is that we will only have access to the pension, and the Pharmaceutical Benefits scheme etc., once we have exhausted our super.

So plan now to avoid any reliance on government welfare, as it may not be there when you’ll need it.

If you would like me to help you explore your options for 20-25 years of dignified retirement, contact me – Bernard Kelly – any time on admin@retirelaughing.com

WHY I DISLIKE DEFENCE FORCE HOUSING

What attracts many investors to Defence Force Housing is the 10 year rental “guarantee”.

Of course, when you understand the fine print, what this “guarantee” really means is that DFA will only keep paying you the rent while they need your investment property to house defence force personnel.

Investors still recall when the RAAF base in Bairnsdale, Victoria, was closed, all those local DFA homes were then no longer required. With a glut of houses for sale, investors couldn’t exit, and of course there weren’t tenants to occupy all of those ex-DFA houses.

Now the Rudd government has commissioned an audit by the Boston Consulting Group to slash $2 billion from the Defence Department’s budget.

Late in the Howard years, there were proposals to close the Woodside Army Barracks in South Australia and the Richmond RAAF Base in New South Wales. These proposals could be readily reactivated.

A far better investment strategy is to avoid such obvious risks and only acquire investments properties in a growth corridor adjacent to a major, diversified economic zone.

If you would like me to help you explore your options, contact me – Bernard Kelly – anytime at

admin@retirelaughing.com

IPSWICH NEEDS 116,000 NEW HOMES BY 2031

The number of new homes in the Ipswich local government area will treble over the next 20 years if the Queensland Government's forecasts are right.

Its draft regional plan for southeast Queensland, released on 7 December, predicts that the Ipswich region will need 116,000 new dwellings by 2031.

Ipswich Mayor Paul Pisasale's reaction was to declare: "Bring it on."Ipswich wasn't ready 10 years ago, but we are now."

The new regional plan, which will be open to public comment until April next year, proposes that Brisbane's western corridor be the area's next major population growth.

The state's new draft regional plan for southeast Queensland forecasts that 735,500 dwellings need to be built in the region by 2031, a 65 per cent jump on the current number of 1.1 million.

I'm Bernard Kelly http://www.retirelaughing.com/

Source: The Courier Mail 8 December 2008

SUPER INADEQUACY FINALLY ACKNOWLEDGED

Politicians have finally acknowledged what most of us have known for some time – it will not be possible for superannuation to provide us with an adequate income for 20-25 years of dignified retirement for the vast majority of us.

Which is why I have been urging my private clients to build a portfolio of investment properties.

When the Australian Government announced the review of Australia's tax system in May 2008, the review was to look solely at the current tax system and make recommendations to position Australia to deal with the demographic, social, economic and environmental challenges of the 21st century.

This study – the Henry Review – was to consider (among other topics) the tax benefits afforded to superannuation, but now the terms of reference have been amended to provide for consideration of the adequacy of existing superannuation arrangements.

Of course the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia have long advocated that the employer contributions should be 15%, and the major wealth management company AMP now believes that a target for “adequacy” is 65% of an individual’s pre-retirement living standards.

COTA Over 50s – reflecting the less affluent socio-economics of its membership base - has long advocated a retirement incomes system based on the actual cost of living in modest circumstances commensurate with contemporary Australian standards. A pension of 35% of male total average weekly earnings seems a good place to start, they say.

However none of these institutions have the solution to outliving our wealth, and inflation-protecting our income in retirement.

Which is why investment properties are so attractive.

If you would like me to help you explore your options, feel free to contact me – Bernard Kelly – anytime on admin@retirelaughing.com